Hello and welcome to CertForums.co.uk, here we host free active certification forums with links to the best free resources for Microsoft's MCSA MCSE MCDBA Cisco's CCNA CCDA and CCNP, and CompTIA's A+ Network+ i-NET+ and Security+ certifications in the UK. If you wish to post or use other advanced features you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration
process or your account login, please contact support
I spent most of the evening fighting with ATI's drivers trying to get even minimal performance out of them along with hardware acceleration. It was impossible.
Basic graphics performance in Gnome was so bad that to scroll down a page in Firefox, or any other application I tried, was so slow as to be completely unusable. Using the down arrow on the scroll bar in Firefox caused the page to scroll at about 1/8 of an inch every 4-5 seconds. You could watch the refresh line scroll down the screen it was so slow. In Evolution or Thunderbird scrolling down the list of folders in the inbox would cause all the names of the folders to run together.
Trying to use the mouse wheel for scrolling was impossible. The pages simply wouldn't scroll. After fighting with this for some time I finally found a couple of conversations between Ubuntu developers and it seems that this type of performance is typical of ATI's proprietary drivers for quite a few of ATI's newer GPU's.
ATI really needs to get it together. It's a major gamble to buy an ATI card if you run Linux as you never really know what performance will be like until you get the card into your system, and when it's bad, it's really, really, really bad.
Behold, the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.
the Via Chipsets aren't all that better, I've just picked up a Inno3D iChill 7600GT DDR3 its a bit OTT but wanted to play it safe lol, @Fergal I dont think its affecting the mouse wheel speed but the GFX card is struggling to make the screen move up and down
Last edited by ThomasMc : 30-Apr-2008 at 02:25 PM.
Wow. Didn't think I'd be having to explain this to anyone....
Uhhhh.... Gui's are all graphics....
”
yeah, but whether your mouse scrollwheel moves the page up and down isnt controlled by the Graphics card. How it renders may be, but not the actual function.
"Im Nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream"
You'd be surprised. A screen scroll is often programmed as a 'Bit Blit'. You can either do it the hard way and program it yourself, or ask the hardware to do it. If the hardware won't do it then you need to simulate this in software, which can be amazingly slow.
yeah, but whether your mouse scrollwheel moves the page up and down isnt controlled by the Graphics card. How it renders may be, but not the actual function.
”
That's right. The graphics card's job is to render graphics. Changing from ATI's drivers to the Xorg open source driver returned me to normal functionality. The scroll arrows and scrolling with the mouse wheel now function normally, i.e. it doesn't take several seconds to scroll an 1/8th of an inch of screen real estate. I don't have hardware rendering or 3D acceleration with them, but at least my system is usable again.
I don't know that I've ever seen such poor graphics rendering by any card, including cards built-in motherboards. This card is a PCI Expressx16 2.0 card in a PCI Expressx16 2.0 slot, has 512 megs of ram, a 600 mhz GPU, and with the drivers the manufacturer writes the performance is so bad the system is unusable.
Behold, the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.
At least you get a screen!
Installed Hardy Heron a couple of days ago, booted in, all fine, then enabled the ATI restricted drivers.
After the mandatory restart, all I get is a blank screen!
Tempted to dig out my old Green FX5900 XT (current card is a Red X1950 Pro) and see if that's any better.
This style is not free; this style is expensive
Robin: "That's an impossible shot, Batman."
Batman: "That's a negative attitude, Robin."
At least you get a screen!
Installed Hardy Heron a couple of days ago, booted in, all fine, then enabled the ATI restricted drivers.
After the mandatory restart, all I get is a blank screen!
Tempted to dig out my old Green FX5900 XT (current card is a Red X1950 Pro) and see if that's any better.
”
Go take a look at the Xorg logs after a failed xserver start, from a console (CTRL>Alt>F1 to F6). They are in /var/log, and should have a naming convention like Xorg.0.log, at least that's the naming convention in Debian, and the older logs normally have .1, .2.tgz, etc... tacked onto them. Each boot attempt creates a new log. I normally use "less" to view them so I can scroll back and forth through the logs.
Behold, the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.
In my experience ATI drivers are always crap, another vote for NVidia !
Don't worry freddy I understood you perfectly ! Yeah software bitblt's suck, I remember playing with the software only driver for direct X once, nasty...