Hello and welcome to CertForums.co.uk, here we host free active certification forums with links to the best free resources for Microsoft's MCSA MCSE MCDBA Cisco's CCNA CCDA and CCNP, and CompTIA's A+ Network+ i-NET+ and Security+ certifications in the UK. If you wish to post or use other advanced features you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support

Go Back   CertForums > Computing Support Forums > Networking
Home Forums Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

NIC teaming improve performance

Post New ThreadReply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13-May-2008, 01:13 PM
garyb's Avatar
garyb garyb is offline
Valued Member
Posts: 153
Points: 24 garyb has between 1 & 100 points
Power: 4
None
Join Date: 27 Feb 2007
Location: Peterborough UK
Age: 40
WIP: MCSA 2003
NIC teaming improve performance

Hi,
We have IIS6 2GB RAM on 3GB Xeon processors which host our front end websites in a DMZ. This then connects to our SQL server on the LAN over 100Mb Full duplex, has worked fine for us. Lately we have had 3rd party design another website for us using .NET & lots of javascript, which now and again times out, not great experience for end user.

They have suggested using NIC teaming to improve the performance and ultimately stopping the timeouts on a machine that coped fine before this app. I have used various tools to monitor the traffic on this server and it appears to be no problem, is there any benefit for teaming NICs to iimprove performance?

Cheers

 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-May-2008, 01:24 PM
Fastracksteve's Avatar
Fastracksteve Fastracksteve is offline
New Member
Posts: 46
Points: 171 Fastracksteve has over 100 pointsFastracksteve has over 100 points
Power: 2
None
Join Date: 09 May 2008
Location: Newcastle U Lyme
Certifications: CCDA ACSE CCWA Mitel SX2000 & 3300
By NIC Teaming do you mean link aggregation?


If you do, well it would depend on lots of other things such as what else is in the network and the size internet pipe.


Last edited by Fastracksteve : 13-May-2008 at 01:26 PM.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-May-2008, 01:33 PM
garyb's Avatar
garyb garyb is offline
Valued Member
Posts: 153
Points: 24 garyb has between 1 & 100 points
Power: 4
None
Join Date: 27 Feb 2007
Location: Peterborough UK
Age: 40
WIP: MCSA 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastracksteve View Post
By NIC Teaming do you mean link aggregation?


If you do, well it would depend on lots of other things such as what else is in the network and the size internet pipe.
They suggested NIC teaming, on my NIC its called Load balancing, but I think its more or less the same end. They want more throughput on the machine which I dont agree with. The NIC on IIS & SQL boxes are Gigabit but the LAN/DMZ ports on the firewall are only 100Mbps meaning the amount of data getting sent by IIS to SQL is always going to max of of 100Mbps anyway. Increasing available amount to 2GB on IIS is pointless in my eyes?

On your other question, the pipe is 2Mbps leased line and these are the onlky 2 boxes in that enviroment.

Cheers

 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-May-2008, 01:39 PM
Fastracksteve's Avatar
Fastracksteve Fastracksteve is offline
New Member
Posts: 46
Points: 171 Fastracksteve has over 100 pointsFastracksteve has over 100 points
Power: 2
None
Join Date: 09 May 2008
Location: Newcastle U Lyme
Certifications: CCDA ACSE CCWA Mitel SX2000 & 3300
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyb View Post
They suggested NIC teaming, on my NIC its called Load balancing, but I think its more or less the same end. They want more throughput on the machine which I dont agree with. The NIC on IIS & SQL boxes are Gigabit but the LAN/DMZ ports on the firewall are only 100Mbps meaning the amount of data getting sent by IIS to SQL is always going to max of of 100Mbps anyway. Increasing available amount to 2GB on IIS is pointless in my eyes?

On your other question, the pipe is 2Mbps leased line and these are the onlky 2 boxes in that enviroment.

Cheers
Hi Gary, well I may stand corrected here but I can't see any benefit in what's being suggested either to be honest. You are, in effect going to be doing exactly as you suggest in your post.

Cheers and sorry I couldn't be of more use to you.

 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-May-2008, 02:51 PM
garyb's Avatar
garyb garyb is offline
Valued Member
Posts: 153
Points: 24 garyb has between 1 & 100 points
Power: 4
None
Join Date: 27 Feb 2007
Location: Peterborough UK
Age: 40
WIP: MCSA 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastracksteve View Post
Hi Gary, well I may stand corrected here but I can't see any benefit in what's being suggested either to be honest. You are, in effect going to be doing exactly as you suggest in your post.

Cheers and sorry I couldn't be of more use to you.
No worries, its always nice to hear someone else confirm your thoughts!

Thanx

G

 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-Jun-2008, 07:33 PM
vitamin's Avatar
vitamin vitamin is offline
New Member
Posts: 14
Points: 0 vitamin has no points
Power: 2
None
Join Date: 17 Oct 2007
Location: UK
Age: 22
WIP: CCNA/N+
Im going to add my 2 pence here too. Surley the problem could be 2Mb lease line causing the bottle neck at busy times rather than the DMZ. Just a thought.....

 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-Jun-2008, 10:05 PM
nugget's Avatar
nugget nugget is offline
Junior toady
Posts: 6,008
Points: 1132 nugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 pointsnugget has over 1000 points
Power: 81
Join Date: 22 Jul 2003
Location: Switzerland
Certifications: A+ Network+ MCP's 270, 290 MCDST
WIP: MCSA 2003
Personally I think it's more to do with the new website's programming. If it was working before on the same two servers over the same connection to the internet, the only thing that's really changed (different than before) is the new website.

Might pay to get a second 3rd party in to check it over.


My little place.

Das hier ist euer Erbe, Doch wenn’s euch nicht gefällt
Dann werdet bessere Menschen, Und ihr kriegt ’ne bessere Welt
[Entfache dieses Feuer by the Böhse Onkelz]

My new PC
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Graphics: Asus EN8800GTS 512MB
Mainboard: Asus R.O.G. Maximus Extreme
PSU: Be Quiet Dark Power BQT P7 - PRO-650W
RAM: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DHX DDR3-1600
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-Jun-2008, 10:17 PM
Sparky's Avatar
Sparky Sparky is offline
Premium Member
Posts: 5,524
Points: 2905 Sparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 pointsSparky has over 2500 points
Power: 90
None
Join Date: 15 Dec 2005
Location: Scotland
Age: 29
Certifications: MSc MCSE MCSA:M MCTS:Vista N+ A+
WIP: Server 2008 upgrade
What kind of NIC is in the server just now? Check for driver updates etc.Can you get any SNMP monitoring on the NIC? That would give you the info you need.

I would be surprised if the NIC is causing the issue here but you need the hard facts.

Edit: Any AV on the servers and if so have they be configured correctly?


 
Reply With Quote
Post New ThreadReply Spread this thread: Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us


Go Back   CertForums > Computing Support Forums > Networking


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Performance Web Sites tripwire45 Reviews 1 14-Jan-2008 04:42 PM
SP3 brings performance boost grim Software 2 28-Nov-2007 12:39 PM
FYI: VMWare + W2k3 + RIS - NIC Issue Jock_McTartan Virtual Computing 5 05-Nov-2007 08:29 AM
performance of CPU cache size grim Hardware & Upgrading 0 29-Oct-2007 02:01 PM
NTFS Hacks to Improve Windows Performance tripwire45 News 0 30-Jan-2006 12:18 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CertForums.co.uk (C) copyright 2003-2007 All Rights Reserved. Content published on CertForums.co.uk requires permission for reprint.
Hosted by Lunarpages